Ben & Jerry’s co-founder accuses Magnum of ‘Orwellian’ techniques in ousting administrators from lefty board

Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Ben Cohen has accused Magnum Ice Cream Company of utilizing “Orwellian” techniques to oust board members and muzzle the model’s social mission – which has included support of Palestinians amid the battle in Gaza.
Unilever – which acquired Ben & Jerry’s in 2000 and agreed to keep up its impartial board – last week spun off its ice cream manufacturers, including Ben & Jerry’s, into a separate company referred to as Magnum.
Ben & Jerry’s CEO Jochanan Senf, who was appointed by Unilever, up to date the board’s phrases and added a nine-year restrict, successfully pushing out three administrators and arguing it will improve governance and transparency.
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield co-founded Ben & Jerry’s in Vermont in 1978. Getty Images for MoveOn
But Cohen – who co-founded the lefty ice cream model with Jerry Greenfield in 1978 – said this protection of the board modifications was “Orwellian.”
“They said that they’re enhancing the social mission when they’re actually destroying it. They said that they’re future-proofing the Board of Directors when they’re actually dismantling it,” Cohen told CNBC during an interview, calling it a “desperate power grab.”
A Magnum spokesperson told The Post that the board modifications “aim to preserve and enhance the brand’s historical social mission and safeguard its essential integrity.”
Unilever didn’t instantly reply to The Post’s requests for remark.
As half of the new time period restrict, Anuradha Mittal, who joined the board in 2007 and served as chair since 2018, was ousted – which Magnum said happened following “internal investigations.”
“Initially, they were trying to get rid of the chairman of the [independent] board, by making these unfounded allegations that she’s ‘not fit to serve’. They weren’t able to substantiate that, so now they’re saying, well, she served for too long,” Cohen told CNBC. “It’s arbitrary, and it’s illegal.”
Cohen, who still works for Ben & Jerry’s, said he doesn’t see any worth in the Magnum spin-off, which incorporates Ben & Jerry’s, Heartbrand, Magnum and Cornetto and debuted on public markets in Amsterdam and New York last week.
Unilever – which acquired Ben & Jerry’s in 2000 – last week spun off its ice cream unit into a separate company. Adriana – stock.adobe.com
“They don’t understand that the value of Ben & Jerry’s is tied up in the position that it has established as being in the forefront of businesses that have a concern for the overall benefit of the society, as opposed to just maximizing profits,” Cohen said of management.
Ben & Jerry’s raked in roughly $1.3 billion in income in 2024, making it the third-largest income generator out of the group’s more than 100 manufacturers.
But Cohen argued traders can be a lot better off if Magnum bought off Ben & Jerry’s, took the money and “bought some other middle-of-the-road brands, because that’s what they’re good at.”
“There’s a lot of money to be made in middle of the road stuff, but they ought to stick to their knitting and not try to not try to force Ben & Jerry’s to become just another one of their middle of the road brands,” he continued.
Unilever and Magnum have repeatedly said Ben & Jerry’s just isn’t for sale – however Cohen and Greenfield have been main a #FreeBenAndJerrys campaign urging the company to promote the model to a group of traders who would honor its social mission.
It’s the latest in a drawn-out battle between the model’s liberal co-founders and its guardian company – beginning in 2021 when Ben & Jerry’s announced it will end sales in the Israel-occupied West Bank.
Unilever responded by promoting off the company’s license for the area.
Ben Cohen (proper), who still works for Ben & Jerry’s, said he doesn’t see any worth in the Magnum spin-off. Getty Images for MoveOn
In November 2024, impartial board members filed a lawsuit accusing Unilever of gagging Ben & Jerry’s from talking out in support of Palestinian refugees.
In a courtroom submitting, the board also accused Unilever of abruptly firing Ben & Jerry’s CEO David Stever without giving board members a likelihood to interview substitute candidates.
Cohen told CNBC there’s a group of traders “ready” to buy Ben & Jerry’s. He accused Unilever and Magnum of refusing to reveal the needed financial info to make a correct offer.
A Magnum spokesperson told The Post that it “remains unequivocally committed to Ben & Jerry’s three-part mission.”
But Cohen said the mission is “something that people who are brought up in the Unilever traditional system can’t understand.”
“It took us a long time to figure it out…and they’re just trying to make us into another piece of frozen mush,” Cohen added.
Magnum CEO Peter ter Kulve told the Financial Times earlier this month that Cohen and Greenfield ought to “hand over to a new generation” – however Cohen said the sale just isn’t about him.
“I have no problem handing over the company to this group of investors that support the values… and if Magnum actually supported the social mission, I’d have no problem with them doing it,” he told CNBC.
Navigate the fast-paced world of business with us. At OurFinancetoday.com/business, we offer well timed and insightful coverage on every little thing from market developments and startup success tales to financial news, entrepreneurship suggestions, and global financial shifts.
Whether you are an aspiring entrepreneur, a small business proprietor, or a seasoned govt, our content is designed to tell, empower, and inspire your next transfer in the business world.
Our editorial team dives deep into real-world methods, company profiles, and skilled analysis to deliver you articles that matter. We simplify advanced business developments and highlight the innovations, challenges, and alternatives shaping industries today.
Make sure to bookmark our Business part and go to often — in a world that never stops shifting, staying informed is your largest benefit.